KUZMICH LAW FIRM, P.C.
335 West Main Street
Lewisville, Texas 75057
Phone: 972 434-1555   Fax: 972 219-9948
Toll Free:  1-877-434-1555

Home  |  Contacts  |  Inquiries  .

Home
Our Firm
Practice Areas
Contacts
Inquiries
Client Survey
Client Comments
Case Verdicts
Significant Recoveries
Links

Office Hours
Monday - Friday
8 a.m - 5 p.m

(or by appointment for
weekends and evenings)


Se habla Español


Case Verdicts

Trials

Type of Case

Result

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Assault

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Criminal Mischief

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Aggravated Assault

Jury Trial – Mistrial / Hung Jury;

Subsequently Dismissed

Delivery of a Controlled Substance

Jury Trial – Mistrial / Hung Jury;

Subsequently Pled to a Reduced Charge

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Theft

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Driving While License Suspended and Possession of Controlled Substance

Dismissed prior to trial

Felony Injury to a Child and Assault Family Violence

Declined to prosecute

Possession of a Controlled Substance and Theft

Dismissed prior to trial

Possession of Marijuana and Controlled Substance

Dismissed prior to trial

Assault Family Violence

Declined to prosecute

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Felony Evading Arrest with a Motor Vehicle,  Driving While Intoxicated, and Possession of Marijuana

Declined to prosecute - Evading Arrest

Dismissed - Driving While Intoxicated and Possession of Marijuana

Assault Family Violence

 Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Two counts of Attempted Murder

Negotiated guilty plea - reduced charges of Misdemeanor Assault

Minor in Possession of Alcohol

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Terrorist Threats

Dismissed prior to trial

Carrying an Illegal Knife

Dismissed prior to trial

Driving While Intoxicated and Failed Breath Test

Dismissal – Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Suppress

Felony Possession of a Controlled Substance

Dismissed prior to trial

Juvenile Assault

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Driving While Intoxicated causing Accident

Dismissal – Driving while Intoxicated and Guilty Plea to reduced traffic charge

Criminal Mischief of School

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Racing on a Highway causing Seriously Bodily Injury

Dismissed at time of trial

Theft from Employer

Jury Trial – Not Guilty

Possession of a Controlled Substance

Dismissal – Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Suppress

Possession of a Controlled Substance and Possession of Marijuana

Grand Jury – No Bill of Indictment

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed at time of trial

Driving While Intoxicated

Jury Trial – Not Guilty


Appeals

Local high school coach and teacher arrested and charged with hazing based upon mere attendance at party where hazing was alleged to have occurred. As a result of Mr. Bailey’s aggressive defense of the charges, the trial court found the hazing statute to be unconstitutional as applied to our client.  The State appealed and Mr. Bailey successfully defended the trial court's decision before the court of appeals, which affirmed the unconstitutionality of the statute.  The State appealed further to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which refused to hear the case, affirming the lower court decisions.  The court of appeals decision is published as State v. Zascavage, 216 S.W.3d 495 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2007, pet. ref'd).

Local police chief investigated a fatality motor vehicle accident and refused to release public information concerning the investigation.  Mr. Bailey filed a civil suit seeking a writ of mandamus to require the chief to produce the records.  The trial court agreed with Mr. Bailey and ordered the chief to produce the records.  The chief appealed to the court of appeals, which affirmed the trial court's order granting the writ of mandamus.  The court of appeals decision is published as Simmons v. Kuzmich, 166 S.W.3d 342 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2005, no writ).

Citizen arrested and charged with felony possession of a controlled substance and convicted by jury (different trial counsel). Mr. Bailey was appointed to handle the appeal and challenged the constitutionality of the search and seizure of evidence by police.  The court of appeals agreed with Mr. Bailey that the police conduct was illegal and reversed the conviction, rendering a judgment of acquittal.  The court of appeals decision was not published (2001).


[Home] [Our Firm] [Practice Areas] [Contacts] [Inquiries] [Client Survey] [Client Comments] [Case Verdicts] [Significant Recoveries] [Links]

This Website is Copyright ©2003 Kuzmich Law Firm, P.C.

 


This site is designed maintained and hosted by JMG Enterprises